[Answerkey] Reasoning, Syllogism, Subaltern arguments, Coding-Decoding, Sequence-Series MCQS in UGC JRF/NET-2017 solved with explanationDEVENDRA VISHWAKARMA
- Reasoning Questions in UGC/NET exam
- Sequence Series (2 MCQ)
- Coding Decoding (1 MCQ)
- Odd man out (1 MCQ)
- Syllogism (2 MCQs)
- Philosophical Logic theory (4 MCQs)
Reasoning Questions in UGC/NET exam
|In previous years’ UGC-NET/JRF exams||This time in January 2017|
|They ask ~10 MCQs from reasoning topics.||Quantity wise same.|
||Asked- with easy to moderate difficulty level.|
|In recent years, they’ve extended the syllogism to high level philosophical theory e.g. subaltern argument, square of opposition, irreflexive premise relations etc.||Continued the trend with four MCQs.|
We can classify them into three levels:
- Low level reasoning: including coding-decoding, blood relation etc
- Practice is more important than theory. You can do it from previous papers.
- In the actual exam, coding decoding / sequence series MCQs should be done at last. Because if you can’t decode the pattern you may unnecessarily waste 10-15 minutes in a single MCQs (if you attempt these questions during start or middle of the exam)
- Clock calendar tricks given in this article.
- Coding-decoding, sequence series, blood relation: use B.S.Sijwali’s reasoning book .
- Some people would recommend R.S.Aggarwal’s reasoning book, but I don’t recommend it. because for each topic Aggarwal would give ~200 practice questions, but in real life, noone has that much time to solve all. Yet, you’ve to pay Rs.100 more (Because his book has more pages due to so many qs). So better go with cheaper and leaner book i.e. Sijwali!
- High level reasoning (syllogism)
- Even for this Sijwali is sufficient.
- If you’re simultenously preparing for Banking exams / UPSC civil services then better go for M.K.Pandey’s analytical reasoning book .
- Extra-high level reasoning (philosophy Logic theory)
- Cost: benefit is bad. Because every year, they come up with some new concept that wasn’t asked in earlier exam and not giving in the routine books for aptitude.
- At max following topic should be prepared from the google books / internet: 1) sub-alteren argument 2) square of opposition.
Anyways, let’s solve the questions asked in January 2017’s NET exam
Sequence Series (2 MCQ)
Q). The missing term in the series 1, 4, 27, 16, ?, 36,343,… is
Let’s check the pattern
It seems the pattern is: if even number then do its square.
If odd number then do its cube.
So by that logic, the missing term should be cube of 5 = 125.
Q) The next term in the following series
YEB, WFD, UHG, SKI, _?_ will be
|2||W(-2 than before)||F (+1 than before)||D|
|3||U (-2 than before)||H (+2 than before)||G|
|4||S (-2 than before)||K (+3 than before)||I|
|5||Q (-2 than before)||O (+4 than before)|
- Alphabet #1 is decreasing at the rate of 2 places. So, accordingly, first term should be S-2=Q. we are left with answer choice 2 or 3.
- Middle alphabet is increasing at the Arithmetic progression @+1. so next term should be K+4=O. so, By elimination we are left with answer choice 2. (in exam, time is precious so no need to decode fully)
- In third alphabet, if it’s even numbered than term than jumping by +1 place and if odd numbered term than jumping by +2 places.
- So, accordingly, fifth term should be I+2 jumps=L. so full length Q-O-L. hence answer (2) is verified.
Coding Decoding (1 MCQ)
Q. If A is coded as C, M as I, N as P, S as O, I as A, P as N, E as M, O as E, and C as S, then the code of COMPANIES will be
Although in real exam, to save time, you have to only decode the first two and last one alphabet and by elimination you’d arrive at answer “4”.
Odd man out (1 MCQ)
Q) Out of four cities given below three are alike in some manner while the fourth one is different. Identify the odd one
Ganga doesn’t pass through Lucknow. See the following map
So 1 is the answer.
Syllogism (2 MCQs)
Q) Given below are two premised (a) and (b). from those two premises four conclusions i, ii, iii, iv are drawn. Select the code that states the conclusions validly drawn from the premises (taking singly or jointly)
- Untouchability is a curse
- All hot pans are untouchable
- All hot pans are curse
- some untouchable things are hot pans
- All curses are untouchability
- Some curses are untouchability
- (i) and (ii)
- (ii) and (iii)
- (iii) and (iv)
- (ii) and (iv)
First let’s align the premise statements
|A (universal positive)||All hot pans||are untouchable|
|A (universal positive)||Untouchability||is a curse|
- As per the rules of syllogism,
- Middle term distributed atleast once….yes
- Remove middle term, and join hotpans to curse. And what is not distributed in premise, can’t be distributed in the conclusion. Therefore, conclusion will be
|A||All hot pans||are curse.|
Hence statement-(i) follows. By elimination, we are left with answer 1.
Now just to cross check whether statement (ii) also follows (singly).
All hot pans are untouchable (universal positive-A)
As per the rules of conversion given in M.K.Pandey’s book analytical reasoning on Page 307,
“A” converts to particular positive (I).
So,All hot pans are untouchable -> some untouchables are hot pans. So yes (ii) also follows. Therefore, answer is 1-(i) and (ii) follows.